Unsolicited Advice on Reviewing a Season

An athlete has just finished up a big season of training, racing, and travelling to events. They are now taking an off-season break (we hope!). They are freshening up and ready to jump, head first, into preparation for the next year’s big objectives, everything is possible! Time to leave last year in the rear view mirror, right? No!

So much can be learned from a good review of a past season. In that review, coaches and athletes, together, can always find lessons to apply to the next season.  It could be how an athlete responded to certain training sessions, nerves the evening before a race, race day nutrition, and so on and so on. The information revealed in reflection almost always outweighs the information we thought we had going in. The saying “20/20 Hindsight” rings pretty true.

OK, so we have sold you on review (wow, you’re an easy sell!), what is the first step? We believe there are two, equally important, aspects in reviewing a season. The first component, in a good review, is the qualitative, or subjective, component. Often this is where the coach can learn the most, from the athlete. For us, the qualitative component of a typical season review involves asking our athletes a series of questions. What the exact questions are is less important, than the questions being asked. In the day and age of data that we live in, it is easy to get blinded by numbers.  However, at the end of the day, every athlete is unique, and every athlete knows what he or she is feeling, better than a number can portray. The goal is to create a dialogue, where a season is examined, from the subjective sense. Here are some questions we have found to be a useful spring board, for this dialogue:

  • Regarding execution and preparation for races, what did you do well this year? What did you do poorly?
  • Regarding training, what do you feel worked well for you? What would you want to try differently going into next year?
  • What do you see as your biggest strength as an athlete? What do you see as your biggest weakness?
  • Were there moments, in this past season, where you felt exceptionally good? Were there moments, where you felt exceptionally bad?
  • What did you enjoy about this past season? What did you not enjoy?

The analytical tools at a coach and athlete’s disposal today are massive, which means it is very easy to get overwhelmed by numbers. Numbers are only useful if they make a difference in performance. This sounds simple, but is difficult to implement.  Our approach is to outline a few task specific metrics, such as peak powers or course times, and track them. These task specific metrics are going to be different for different athletes, because different athletes have not just different events, but also different limiters within those events. Inevitably, when tracking metrics, there are going to be components that contribute to performance, which you may not track. By narrowing it down to a few metrics, it also means coaches and athletes avoid drowning in a sea of numbers. Pick metrics that have a high correlation to how an athlete performs in competition. If you notice that the metrics you are tracking are improving, and competition performance is not, or vice versa, it does not mean the metrics are worthless. It could mean that the nature of the competition is changing and training needs to be focused elsewhere, or conversely, that the athlete is improving other performance parameters, such as tactical sense, and that is outweighing the fact that quantitative metrics have reached a plateau. All possibilities lead to really valuable information that can positively influence preparation for future events.

Here is an example of some metrics we are tracking with one of our athletes that competes in events where the critical moments are often about the power one can produce under fatigue.  We have picked some metrics tailored to that:

Screen Shot 2017-10-17 at 7.34.11 AM.png

Now that all this information is collected, the next step is to set some goals for next year, and go smash them! We wish anyone reading, good luck, in their upcoming pursuits…but if you’ve done a good review of the previous season, it will not have much to do with luck!

Don't Chase Base Wattage

Ladies and Gentlemen, we’re excited to introduce “Catalyst Content”! It’s our new blog where you’ll find updates on training, racing, Catalyst athletes, and what’s new in the sport science world. 

Today we’re kicking off a feature where one of our athletes shares their favorite workouts. It is always fun, and valuable, to see the athlete perspective, because a lot can be learned from it.  There’s no silver bullet to training, but we’ll give you a few bronze ones…thanks for reading!

We asked, our athlete, Matti Rowe what his favorite workout is, and here’s what he had to say:

“My favorite workout isn’t a workout, it’s more of an injunction that I see pop up from time to time in the workout description of my workouts and that is ‘don’t chase base wattage.’

I like that, because in the age of STRAVA, and with a certain group of friends you can get into the bad habit of spending a lot of time on the bike not going fast, not going slow, but spending lots of time at a middling pace adding a lot of fatigue that looks good on paper but isn’t actually going to do much for you when you’ve got to jam hard for 20 seconds to follow a move.

Physically, ‘not chasing base wattage’ stops me from being such a diesel because I’m not adding unnecessary fatigue that’s going to take the quality away from my interval sessions.

But really, I think the biggest benefit is upstairs.  There’s a big difference between high zone 2/low zone 3 and low zone 2 mentally.  The former requires a bit of mental exertion while the latter is effortless. The thing is, you’re still doing good work in low zone 2 and since so many hours are spent on the bike at a comfortable base pace it makes the riding so much more pleasurable then kind of going hard all the time.”

First off, a translation is in order, what do we, as coaches, mean by, “don’t chase base wattage”?  When we say, “don’t chase base wattage”, the idea is to ride at a comfortable pace.  What pace would the athlete settle at, if they were riding without a computer?  That is the pace we want.  That pace is going to vary day to day; it is a sensation, not a number.

It is really easy to get caught up in shooting for a high average power, at the expense of doing the true quality pieces of a session below where the athlete is really capable. A perfect example is if an athlete has a big session of intervals, and they perform the intervals 5% below the target, but their average power for the whole ride is comparatively quite high.  This is something that we come across all the time, when we start working with our new athletes.  If an athlete can buy into the idea of “not chasing base wattage”, their quality efforts will improve, because they’re less fatigued going into them.  In addition to the quality aspects of the individual rides being better, the total ride typically does not tax the athlete as much, so their recovery is better and they can do more work in the week and month, as a whole.

Circling back to what Matti noted, about the mentality of “don’t chase base wattage”, the total stress of a training session, is much more than what shows up in the TSS score.  It also includes how much it taxes an athlete mentally.  On paper, someone might have no problem riding around at 250 watts as their “base pace” on all their training rides.  However, in reality, there is always a pace that is doable, but is just a hair uncomfortable.  Year in, year out, we see athletes that insist on trying to ride that pace all the time, and it just grinds them down mentally.  On paper everything might be ok, but if it translates to showing up on the start line 10% less fresh, and not able to race at maximal capacity, then all that training did not really elicit the end goal, best possible performance.  Counter to that, there are plenty of days where high average power is the target.  On those days we, as coaches, definitely believe in the tool the power meter can be in keeping an athlete on track. 

Always good to end with a dichotomy, so we’ll wrap it up there!  Thanks for reading!